Beautiful mostly pure natural landscapes. It almost looks like man has never been there. Some 40 years there was a famous photoexposition, which caused a revolution in landscapephotography: “The new topgraphics”, showing blast furnices and watertowers by Bernd and Hilla Becher, colourphotos by Stephen Shore etc. It was showed the influence of man on modern landscapes, and that is what I mis in these landscapephotos. To my opinion they are almost too picturesque, not real enough.
In a nowadays landscpae, I would espact: citylandscapes, higways and railroads (I know there is a group for transportatio”), agriculture and foodproduction, polution.
Maybe it wouldn’t be it wouldn’t be a bad idea to start a group like: “Planet earth nowadays landscape”, or “Planet Earth food production”.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Beautiful mostly pure natural landscapes. It almost looks like man has never been there. Some 40 years there was a famous photoexposition, which caused a revolution in landscapephotography: “The new topgraphics”, showing blast furnices and watertowers by Bernd and Hilla Becher, colourphotos by Stephen Shore etc. It was showed the influence of man on modern landscapes, and that is what I mis in these landscapephotos. To my opinion they are almost too picturesque, not real enough.
In a nowadays landscpae, I would espact: citylandscapes, higways and railroads (I know there is a group for transportatio”), agriculture and foodproduction, polution.
Maybe it wouldn’t be it wouldn’t be a bad idea to start a group like: “Planet earth nowadays landscape”, or “Planet Earth food production”.
Peter van de Lavoir
LikeLike